Feedback details

(2.5)
Communication
Creativity
Critical thinking
Employability
Professionalism
Custom Questions
  • Q1 - Text short
    What notable qualities or skills did the student demonstrate throughout the project?
    No answer given.
  • Q2 - Text short
    How did the student engage with stakeholders during the project?
    No answer given.
  • Q3 - Text short
    Did the student effectively manage their time and meet project deadlines? If so, how? If not, what areas could they improve in?
    Deadline was extended which was okay but the deliverables remained low quality and we cannot use it as our brand guide.
  • Team feedback

    Thank you for your effort on the deliverable. However, there are a few areas for improvement that we’d like to highlight to ensure stronger outcomes in the future. The overall effort appeared low, and the theme of the deliverable lacked consistency, which impacted its cohesion. Additionally, the work felt rushed, and despite our request for revisions to the graphs, they were not reworked as needed. We also noticed that best practices for using the brand kit were not followed, which is an important detail for maintaining professionalism and alignment. We hope these points will help guide future work, and we look forward to seeing even better results next time.
    Branding Brand identity Research Logo design
    Author
    Atika Juristia
    She / Her
    Executive Director
    Experience
    May 2024 - April 2025 USask Level UP
    Project
    JHI Brand Identity and Graphic Design
    Branding Brand identity Research Logo design
    Created At
    December 4, 2024